Home » News » Goodman Fiedler Wattie Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1991] FCA 206

Goodman Fiedler Wattie Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1991] FCA 206

April 17th, 2014

The issues in these appeals was the disallowance by the Commissioner of deductions claimed by the taxpayer for the income year 1982-85 inclusive. The deductions fell into two categories; payments made by the taxpayer to fund research carried on by the Queensland Institute of Technology (QIT) (the first period); and expenditure incurred thereafter by the taxpayer (the second period).

Background

  • The taxpayer was a company with carried on its business in several divisions. In August 1981 the taxpayer contracted with the QIT to fund the establishment of a Monoclonal Antibodies Development Centre (MADC).
  • In 1982 separate premises were leased at Slacks Creek for the taxpayer’s Mabco Division to set up development and production facilities. Sales of the first monoclonal antibody product occurred in December 1982 and January 1983. Many technical problems arose and the taxpayer eventually sold the Mabco Division in June 1985.
  • The Commissioner asserted that the taxpayer had not commenced its business until the setting up of the premises in Slacks Creek. The taxpayer submitted that the income producing activity in which it was engaged during the first period should be characterised as an activity of R&D of monoclonal antibody products for manufacture and sale, as opposed to manufacturing and selling the products.
  • In respect of the second period, The Commissioner submitted that each new product of a company such as the taxpayer engaged in manufacturing and marketing as well as regular research was to be seen separately. Alternatively the Commissioner claimed that the taxpayer had not satisfied the burden of proof showing that the expenditures incurred by it was not of a capital nature.

Decision

The appeals were allowed in part:

  • For the first period it was found that an essential element of identifying the point of commencement of business activity is commitment to the project. The necessary commitment by the taxpayer was lacking in this case. The taxpayer engaged in activities of a provisional kind only during the first period.
  • In relation to the second period, the whole of the expenditure of the Mabco Division was deductible under either s 51(1) or s 73A(1).

Click here to view the Goodman Fielder Wattie Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation Case.

Are You Eligible?


Click here for the R&D Eligibility Wizard

R&D Audit Checklist


Click here for the R&D Eligibility Wizard

Categories

Archives

 
  
 Swanson Reed - Specialist R&D Tax Advisors 
 
 
 Swanson Reed - Specialist R&D Tax Advisors
  
 39 Google reviews 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 Swanson Reed - Specialist R&D Tax Advisors 
 
 
 Swanson Reed - Specialist R&D Tax Advisors
  
 39 Google reviews 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Daniel McGregor 
 
 
 Daniel McGregor 
 
2022-08-11
 
 
  
 
I have been using Swanson Reed for my clients for more than a decade.  Having a specialist firm that can provide practical and commercial advice that produces real outcomes is very important and we have received great feedback from our clients.
Highly recommended.
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 John 
 
 
 John 
 
2022-06-15
 
 
  
 
Damian and the rest of the team at Swanson Reed have been supporting us for several years.  We always appreciate their insights, expertise, and efforts.
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Rueben Rajasingam 
 
 
 Rueben Rajasingam 
 
2022-06-06
 
 
  
 
Experienced responsive Team. They have been a great help to me and my company navigate the R&D tax claim process and have provided invaluable advice.
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Enrique Esquivel 
 
 
 Enrique Esquivel 
 
2022-06-06
 
 
  
 
Damian and the team at Swanson Reed have been extremely helpfully and professional during all of our consultations. Highly recommended.
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Jess at Y&C 
 
 
 Jess at Y&C 
 
2022-06-03
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Anatole Kononewsky 
 
 
 Anatole Kononewsky 
 
2022-06-02
 
 
  
 
The Swanson Reed team have provided our company with exceptional professional advice and assistance for all of our R&D claims for many years - have always achieved great results with excellent value for their services.
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Payam Toloo 
 
 
 Payam Toloo 
 
2022-06-02
 
 
  
 
Damian Smyth and his team are very helpful, supportive and experts in their field of R&D Tax claims. I'm always happy with the work they do and been a customer of their for over 5 years.
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Melissa Doddy 
 
 
 Melissa Doddy 
 
2022-05-31
 
 
  
 
The Team at Swanson Reed are very experienced R&D Tax Advisors and gave us ongoing support with all of our R&D Claims, the consultants ensured we were always working with current legislative guidelines, gave us assistance with compiling technical and government documentation and went out their way to ensure they were with us for the entire process from beginning to end.  Highly recommended to anyone who needs assistance with working through what can at times be a daunting process.
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Gary Watson 
 
 
 Gary Watson 
 
2022-05-31
 
 
  
 
We can highly recommend Swanson and Reed as an R & D accountant. We have worked with them for several years now as they make our R & D claim so easy and communicate quickly with both us and our accountant.
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 Rob van den Bergh 
 
 
 Rob van den Bergh 
 
2022-05-31
 
 
  
 
Always professional.