Join Swanson Reed, UHY Haines Norton and Wrays for a practical workshop that will focus on the problems that every day companies face in protecting, and claiming incentives for their new products.
You will hear from three industry experts on a range of topics, including tax issues, R&D tax incentives and patent protection.
On conclusion of the presentation, participants will have an opportunity to ask the panel any specific questions in a friendly and constructive forum.
Time | Presentation | Presenter | |
7:00am – 7:30am: | Session 1: Protecting Intellectual Property (IP) | Joe Seisdedos | |
7:30am – 8:00am: | Session 2: IP & Relevant Tax Considerations | Bill Charlton | |
8:00am – 8:30am: | Session 3: R&D Tax Incentives | Michael Oon | |
8:30am – 9:00am: | Session 4: Panel Q&A and Networking Opportunity |
Joe Seisdedos | Bill Charlton | Michael Oon |
View Joe’s bio | View Bill’s bio | View Michael’s bio |
Wednesday, 18th June 2014
7am – 9am
Swanson Reed Boardroom
Level 11, 42-60 Albert St
Brisbane, 4000
Cost: Free!
Register Before: Friday 13th June
Full attendance at this workshop will yield 2 CPE hours towards the Tax Practitioners Board’s (TPB) CPE requirements.
Contact Amy Nolan for more information:
Ph: 07 3221 1499
Mob: 0435 713 493
Are you Eligible to claim R&D? Take our R&D Eligibility Survey and find out.
30 April Statutory Deadline for FY23 R&D Claims – One Week to Go
There is one week to go until the deadline for FY23 R&D Registrations. Companies seeking to register R&D Activities conducted during the Year Ended 30 June 2023 (companies that have a Standard YE for tax) who are yet to do so, should note that the Registration Deadline is 10 Months after YE, and 30 APRIL 2024. The blanket and automatic extensions granted during COVID do NOT apply any longer or for FY23 claims. Extensions of time may be available in […]
The matter concerns an individual charged by the Commonwealth DPP for attempting to unlawfully obtain a refund under the R&D Tax Incentive. Before being charged, the taxpayer was compulsorily examined by the ATO. The individual had applied to stay the proceedings against them partly by arguing that the ATO had unlawfully distributed transcripts of examinations with other government agencies (namely AusIndustry). The primary judge of the District Court agreed with the taxpayer, and the prosecution applied to the Queensland Court […]