ATO ID 2003/990 Income Tax Research and Development: additional deduction for incremental expenditure where a group member company has a substituted accounting period

August 19th, 2014

If an eligible company is grouped with another company that has a different accounting period, is the ‘year of income’ referred to in paragraph (b) of the definition of ‘R&D spend’ in subsection 73P(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) that of the eligible company, and not that of the group member?

Yes. The eligible company’s ‘year of income’ is used when calculating an amount under paragraph (b) of the definition of ‘R&D spend’ in subsection 73P(2) of the ITAA 1936, for the purposes of sections 73U, 73V, 73W and 73Y of the ITAA 1936.

The company is an ‘eligible company’, as defined in subsection 73B(1) of the ITAA 1936. It undertakes research and development activities in Australia and is examining its entitlement under section 73Y of the ITAA 1936 to an additional deduction relating to ‘incremental expenditure’, as defined in subsection 73P(2) of the ITAA 1936, for a year of income (referred to as the ‘deduction year’ in subsection 73Q(1) of the ITAA 1936).

The eligible company has a normal Australian accounting period ending on 30 June. It satisfies the requirements in subsection 73Q(1) of the ITAA 1936 to be entitled to an additional deduction under section 73Y of the ITAA 1936.

The eligible company is grouped with another company under section 73L of the ITAA 1936.

The company which is grouped with the eligible company, has a substituted accounting period, and lodged a transitional return (covering income and deductions relating to a period greater than 12 months), for the period equating to the year of income immediately prior to the deduction year.

 Calculation of the amount of the additional deduction allowable under section 73Y of the ITAA 1936 requires working out the eligible company’s ‘premium amount’ under section 73W of the ITAA 1936, as well as any apportionment of the premium amount under section 73X of the ITAA 1936.

Click here for full ATO ID.

Categories

Archives

Posted on Google Google
Daniel McGregor  profile picture
Daniel McGregor
11. August, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have been using Swanson Reed for my clients for more than a decade. Having a specialist firm that can provide practical and commercial advice that produces real outcomes is very important and we have received great feedback from our clients. Highly recommended.
Posted on Google Google
John  profile picture
John
15. June, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Damian and the rest of the team at Swanson Reed have been supporting us for several years. We always appreciate their insights, expertise, and efforts.
Posted on Google Google
Rueben Rajasingam  profile picture
Rueben Rajasingam
6. June, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Experienced responsive Team. They have been a great help to me and my company navigate the R&D tax claim process and have provided invaluable advice.
Posted on Google Google
Enrique Esquivel  profile picture
Enrique Esquivel
6. June, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Damian and the team at Swanson Reed have been extremely helpfully and professional during all of our consultations. Highly recommended.
Posted on Google Google
Jess at Y&C  profile picture
Jess at Y&C
3. June, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Posted on Google Google
Anatole Kononewsky  profile picture
Anatole Kononewsky
2. June, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The Swanson Reed team have provided our company with exceptional professional advice and assistance for all of our R&D claims for many years - have always achieved great results with excellent value for their services.
Posted on Google Google
Payam Toloo  profile picture
Payam Toloo
2. June, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Damian Smyth and his team are very helpful, supportive and experts in their field of R&D Tax claims. I'm always happy with the work they do and been a customer of their for over 5 years.
Posted on Google Google
Melissa Doddy  profile picture
Melissa Doddy
31. May, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The Team at Swanson Reed are very experienced R&D Tax Advisors and gave us ongoing support with all of our R&D Claims, the consultants ensured we were always working with current legislative guidelines, gave us assistance with compiling technical and government documentation and went out their way to ensure they were with us for the entire process from beginning to end. Highly recommended to anyone who needs assistance with working through what can at times be a daunting process.
Posted on Google Google
Gary Watson  profile picture
Gary Watson
31. May, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We can highly recommend Swanson and Reed as an R & D accountant. We have worked with them for several years now as they make our R & D claim so easy and communicate quickly with both us and our accountant.
Posted on Google Google
Rob van den Bergh  profile picture
Rob van den Bergh
31. May, 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Always professional.