Free Call: 1300 009 390
H2O Exchange Pty Ltd v Innovation and Science Australia [2021] FCA 11 (22 January 2021)
February 8th, 2021Introduction
In October 2019 a decision was reached by the AAT in the matter of H2O Exchange Pty Ltd and Innovation and Science Australia.
The matter related to dispute of a previous decision by Innovation and Science Australia (AusIndustry) finding that Activities registered under the R&D Tax Incentive were not in accordance with the legislative requirements.
Background
The disputed project registered related to the development of an online platform for the cross-border trading of water entitlements and allocations, that could react to changes (legislative, trade induced) in real-time.
AAT Decision
The AAT upheld AusIndustry’s finding that the R&D Activities were not eligible, since the outcome of the activities were not unknown, and could have been readily deduced on the basis of available knowledge.
The R&D Entity subsequently sought to appeal the matter to the Federal Court, and an order was made by the court on 22 January 2021.
For an appellant entity to be successful in an appeal of a decision of the AAT, they must be able to satisfy the Federal Court that the AAT has erred on a question of law, as occurred in the previous Moreton Resources R&D case. The Federal Court’s order references the grounds of appeal by H2O Exchange as being:
- “1: The Tribunal’s decision was irrational and illogical in accepting expert evidence.
- 2: It was a denial of natural justice to make the presence or absence of research involving AI a relevant issue in the proceeding without advising the parties that that approach would be taken and giving them an opportunity to deal with it.
- 3: It was a denial of natural justice for the Tribunal to proceed with the review when it became evident during the review proceeding that the appellant had filed an application to vary the relevant registration definitions and that the respondent had failed to deal with the variation request.”
H2O Exchange was unable to satisfy the Federal Court that the AAT had erred in respect of each of the three grounds of appeal raised, and the appeal was dismissed.
Learnings from Decision
This case again highlights the importance of documenting and assessing activities in accordance with programme regulator guidance.
Click here to view the H2O Exchange Pty Ltd and Innovation and Science Australia case.
Categories
- ATO Guidance and Materials
- AusIndustry Guidance and Materials
- Case Law
- Federal Budget 2021
- Federal Budget 2022
- For Accountants
- General Information
- Government Policy and Treasury
- Industry Specific Issues
- Interpretative Decisions
- Legislation and Parliamentary Matters
- R&D Tax Credit
- R&D Tax Funding Strategies
- R&D Tax Loans
- Recent News
- Tax Determinations
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
Daniel McGregor2022-08-11I have been using Swanson Reed for my clients for more than a decade. Having a specialist firm that can provide practical and commercial advice that produces real outcomes is very important and we have received great feedback from our clients. Highly recommended.
John2022-06-15Damian and the rest of the team at Swanson Reed have been supporting us for several years. We always appreciate their insights, expertise, and efforts.
Rueben Rajasingam2022-06-06Experienced responsive Team. They have been a great help to me and my company navigate the R&D tax claim process and have provided invaluable advice.
Enrique Esquivel2022-06-06Damian and the team at Swanson Reed have been extremely helpfully and professional during all of our consultations. Highly recommended.
Jess at Y&C2022-06-03
Anatole Kononewsky2022-06-02The Swanson Reed team have provided our company with exceptional professional advice and assistance for all of our R&D claims for many years - have always achieved great results with excellent value for their services.
Payam Toloo2022-06-02Damian Smyth and his team are very helpful, supportive and experts in their field of R&D Tax claims. I'm always happy with the work they do and been a customer of their for over 5 years.
Melissa Doddy2022-05-31The Team at Swanson Reed are very experienced R&D Tax Advisors and gave us ongoing support with all of our R&D Claims, the consultants ensured we were always working with current legislative guidelines, gave us assistance with compiling technical and government documentation and went out their way to ensure they were with us for the entire process from beginning to end. Highly recommended to anyone who needs assistance with working through what can at times be a daunting process.
Gary Watson2022-05-31We can highly recommend Swanson and Reed as an R & D accountant. We have worked with them for several years now as they make our R & D claim so easy and communicate quickly with both us and our accountant.
Rob van den Bergh2022-05-31Always professional.
Quick Contact
News & Research
News & Research
News & ResearchThe matter concerns an individual charged by the Commonwealth DPP for attempting to unlawfully obtain a refund under the R&D Tax Incentive. Before being charged, the taxpayer was compulsorily examined by the ATO. The individual had applied to stay the […]
2023 Annual Report for IISA: Update on R&D Tax Legal matters and litigation
Industry Innovation and Science Australia (IISA) is the government department responsible for determining whether companies’ activities meet the legislative criteria eligible under the R&D Tax Incentive. The 2022-23 Annual Report for IISA was recently released, and a section of the […]
